Never the subject is the person who pronounces the plot. An apple is the object since it is on the receiving side of the action. Normally, past participation does not change when combined with AVOIR, but if there is a previous direct object, the partition must agree. Z.B. The letters I have been. Past participation in the compound past always reflects the gender and number of a previous direct object (see object pronouns). If we use in French a sentence in past Compound that contains a direct object or a direct object pronoun BEFORE the past part, we must modify the extension of the previous part according to the (i) sex and (ii) the quantity of the direct object. But the verbs of Have need coherence in a very specific construction: the past participation must correspond to the direct object if it precedes the verb. I saw the cat cross the street. I saw the female cat crossing the street.
(In this case, the direct object, the chat, is not forward.) A previous direct object does not necessarily have to appear as a pronoun right in front of the verbal sentence. If the past compound is used in a relative set, the modified noun could be a previous direct object (see relative pronouns). She saw Jeanne at the movies. She saw WHO? Jeanne (direct object). “Jeanne” is placed according to the verb, so that in this case the past participation does not change: VU. In a negative sentence, the direct object pronoun arrives according to thene: Nuance: If Ont verbs are used reflexively or recictively (d.b. with a reflex pronoun), they are conjugated with being (see ablation). Yet they will always only agree with a previous direct object. Care must be taken to ensure that the reflexive pronoun is a phenomenon of direct or indirect object. Reflexive If the subject is the direct object of the verb, the past participation of the compound past corresponds with this (see Reflexive). Means “you” if it is used as a direct object name and must come after the ne in a negative sentence.) Notice that in the first sentence, when we ask the question: Do it to me WHAT? MY LETTERS, the direct object is placed according to the verb, so no consent is required.
2) It can take the form of the direct pronoun that: It is cut. (She cut herself off.) [Cutting takes a direct object; therefore, participation corresponds to it.] 5) In case of semi-auxiliary obstructiation, there is no correspondence with the direct object, because the object always belongs to the infinitive, not to the semi-auxiliary. In the first sentence, there is NO match, because the DO is placed according to the verb. In the second clause, there is no agreement with ELLE, because it is a previous indirect object, because “We say something to someone”. Now let`s move on to examples where the direct object (DO) precedes the verb. In the second sentence, however, the direct object is before the verb: Do finished WHAT? The (a pronoun that replaces “the dishes”) so that the past participation in the sex and the number with the previous direct object (FEM. SING.). The direct object of a sentence is the person or thing for which the plot (verb) is executed. For example, if a verb is followed by an ininfinitive, the direct object pronoun arrives just before the infinitiv: On the other side in the second sentence I put WHAT? THE. This pronouum, which replaces YOUR LETTERS, is a direct object and is placed in front of the verb, so the past participation must be in number and sex with the noun LETTERS (FEM. .
. .