Each party assures the other party that it has the right, full power and power to execute and provide the agreement and all the documents it must execute. Anyway, keep an eye on it, you know that legal English is full of pitfalls. The first thing we need to clarify is that this is a typical double of Anglo-Saxon legal jargon (legalese). However, as Adams tells us, performance also involves the performance of an obligation or the performance/complete performance, making it an ambiguous notion with which we must be careful. IN WITNESS WHEREOF has led each party to implement this agreement by its duly accredited representative. The doublet means, among other things, the signing, signature or conclusion of a contract or other document, so that it can be translated into one of these verbs. In this entry, we analyze one of these expressions often enough and ambiguously enough to raise many doubts. Frequent short phrases: 1-400, 401-800, 801-1200, More However, it is now a completely wasted expression that some authors recommend replacing with characters or in. There are many clients and colleagues who have asked us for this formula.
What is it for, what does it mean if it is used and for what purpose? Is it an unnecessary formula or is it something really important? Today, this formula makes little sense, especially in a context where more and more contracts are concluded electronically, but the term remains. In the case of promises that are not contracts What is translation for the verb? Today we return to our legal English dictionary thanks, Pablo. That is a good contribution. In fact, every text is a challenge and you have to go with a lot of eyes. . In addition, [country name] is bound by international law to respect in good faith the commitments made in the convention. In the proof of compliance, the contracting parties sign this agreement through their duly accredited representatives. This agreement is concluded on the day (…) Results: 262. You guessed it: 6. Response time: 389 ms.
We have already spoken to you about the archaic and traditional Anglo-Saxon legal language, haven`t we? “Documents” containing agreements or obligations, authorizations, etc., are established or formalized. Like almost everyone in its species (the Doublet), it is a redundant expression that has been fixed by the force of repetition. So if you want to use it in English, you should do it the same way. Good morning, Claudia. If you could give us a sentence as an example, we would appreciate it. Beware of this term, how many times you will find it without the delivery company. Although this means most of the time the same thing as what we told you before, there may be an exception and perhaps you should not always translate it in the same way. In the past, in legal enterprises that were formalized by a document (which we refused to write; see: What an act and how it differs from our deeds), such as real estate sales, it was necessary for the parties to sign the document, attach their stamp and provide a copy to the Ora parte. As a result, the phrase was signed, sealed and delivered.
Look, you shouldn`t translate it as “run and deliver.” Although this is the translation of Google, by the way. You can and should replace the doublet with a single verb, like some of the ones we have previously proposed. If you reduce the doublet to a single word, it will not lose meaning in our language.