FAR`s subsection 17.5 outlines the policies and procedures required for all inter-institutional acquisitions. (ii) each agency`s documents include the inter-institutional agreement between the applicant agency and the service and contain sufficient documentation to ensure appropriate review in accordance with point 4.801 (b). Inter-institutional acquisitions are procedures where a federal agency that needs supplies or services can obtain these supplies or services from the federal authority. Subsection 17.5 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) describes the policies and procedures applicable to all inter-institutional acquisitions. This regulation stems from the economic law authorizing agencies to enter into agreements for supplies or services by inter-institutional acquisition. Inter-institutional acquisitions are generally made through indeterminate supply contracts, such as supply and supply contracts.B(a) agencies avoid dual audits, audits, inspections and audits of contractors or subcontractors by multiple agencies using inter-institutional agreements; b) business analysis requirements for contracts with multiple agencies and acquisition contracts at the supranational level. To enter into an intergovernmental or government-wide acquisition contract, a business case analysis must be conducted by the service and approved in accordance with the office of Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP) business case guidance, available under www.whitehouse.gov/sites/whitehouse.gov/files/omb/procurement/memo/development-review-and-approval-of-business-cases-for-certain-interagency-and-agency-specific-acquisitions-memo.pdf. The analysis of business cases must be – b) Subject to the tax provisions of the agencies and the applicable inter-institutional agreements, the applicant agency reimburses the service of services rendered in accordance with the economic law (31 Us.C.1535). DoD, GSA and NASA are adopting a final rule to amend the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to obtain a section of John S. Start Printed Page 19838McCain National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2019, which does not require taking the best procurement approach to use an inter-institutional acquisition. (i) before issuing an application, the service and the applicant agency sign a written inter-institutional agreement defining the terms and conditions governing the relationship between the parties, including roles and responsibilities in the planning of the acquisition, the performance of the contract, and the management and management of the contract or contract designation. The applicant agency makes available to the service all the special conditions and the statutes, regulations, directives and other applicable requirements applicable to the agency for registration in the market or contract.
In the event that no agency imposes clear requirements beyond the FAR, the applicant agency informs the service agency contractor in writing. For acquisitions on behalf of the Ministry of Defence, see also Part 17.7. Patent rights see 27.304-2. In preparing inter-institutional agreements to support assisted acquisitions, agencies should review the federal procurement policy guidelines, which are available on www.whitehouse.gov/sites/whitehouse.gov/files/omb/assets/OMB/procurement/interagency_acq/iac_revised.pdf. Section 875 by John S. McCain NDAA for Fy 2019 (Pub. L. 115-232) amends Duncan Hunter NDAA Section 865 for Fy Fy 2009 (Pub. L.
110-417), to remove the requirement for agencies to determine that the use of an inter-institutional acquisition is the best approach to acquisition.